Skip to main content
Research Report

Imagine All the Forces

The Impact of Threatening News Coverage on the Willingness to Militarily Engage in the Resurgence of the East Versus West Conflict

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000180

Abstract. A world divided into East versus West: The so-called Ukraine crisis has once more summoned outdated patterns of political thinking. Simultaneously, media discourses have flared up debating diplomatic and military solutions as possible policy responses. A majority of Germans, however, have remained hesitant to advocate any escalation of military conflict. We were interested in how far reputable journalism concerning the Ukraine crisis might activate a disposition toward military engagement. To evaluate the supposed impact of actual news coverage, we used explicit existential threats (mortality salience; MS) as a comparative measure. Typical effects of MS were derived from terror management theory (TMT), which predicts that the awareness of existential threats amplifies the efforts to defend one’s own culture, even by military means. We used a 2 × 2 factorial design (N = 112) with the factors article (original bellicose vs. neutral, nonmilitant depiction) and salience condition (MS vs. control). Results revealed a strong impact of the original, bellicose article, with increased willingness to deploy German forces at the Russian border, independently of the salience condition. Additional existential threats did not add further effects, as values for willingness were already very high. Classic effects regarding TMT were observed when people had read the Non-Militant article. Here, the willingness to deploy forces only increased after a confrontation with existential threats. We conclude that threatening news coverage on the Ukraine crisis has the ability to alter willingness for first-step military action at the Russian border by inducing effects that are – at least in their outcome – comparable to explicit existential threats.

References

  • Amann, M., Blome, N., Gebauer, M., Neukirch, R. & Schult, C. (2014). Nato-Alarm. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-126267960.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arena, J. (1995). Making things more public: On the political responsibility of the media intellectual. Political Communication, 12(3), 345–346. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1995.9963079 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arendt, F., Marquart, F. & Matthes, J. (2015). Effects of right-wing populist political advertising on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000139 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Balmas, M., Sheafer, T. & Wolfsfeld, G. (2015). Enemies also get their say: Press performance during political crises. International Journal of Communication, 9(21). doi: 1932-8036/20150005 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004252 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bickes, H., Otten, T. & Weymann, L. C. (2014). The financial crisis in the German and English press: Metaphorical structures in the media coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 424–445. doi: 10.1177/0957926514536956 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burke, B. L., Martens, A. & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155–195. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buzan, B. (2008). People, states & fear: An agenda for international security studies in the Post-Cold War era. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Der Spiegel. (2015). Performance data. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel-qc.de/medien/print/der-spiegel/performance-data First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Echebarria Echabe, A. & Perez, S. (2015). The impact of different procedures to arouse mortality awareness on various worldview dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2144 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1989). How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. The Journal of Politics, 51(02), 347–370. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferring, D. & Filipp, S. H. (1996). Measurement of self-esteem: Findings on reliability, validity, and stability of the Rosenberg Scale. Diagnostica, 42(3), 284–292. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D. & Oßwald, S. (2007). Terror salience and punishment: Does terror salience induce threat to social order? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 964–971. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenberg, J., Solomon, S. & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gunther, A. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference – effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25(5). doi: 10.1177/009365098025005002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, D. & Guardino, M. (2010). Whose views made the news? Media coverage and the march to war in Iraq. Political Communication, 27(1), 59–87. doi: 10.1080/10584600903502615 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirschberger, G., Pyszczynski, T. & Ein-Dor, T. (2009). Vulnerability and vigilance: Threat awareness and perceived adversary intent moderate the impact of mortality salience on intergroup violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 597–607. doi: 10.1177/0146167208331093 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lambert, A. J., Eadeh, F. R., Peak, S. A., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P. & Slochower, J. M. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 655. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F. & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1136–1150. doi: 10.1177/0146167204267988 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laux, L. (2013). Das State-Trait-Angst-Depressions-Inventar: STADI; Manual [The Stait-Trait Anxiety-Depression Inventory]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lunney, G. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7(4), 263–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1970.tb00727.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCombs, M. & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Psychology of agenda-setting effects. Mapping the paths of information processing. Review of Communication Research, 2(1). doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Motyl, M., Hart, J. & Pyszczynski, T. (2010). When animals attack: The effects of mortality salience, infrahumanization of violence, and authoritarianism on support for war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 200–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2009.08.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NATO–Russia. (1997). Founding Act on mutual relations, cooperation and security between NATO and the Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_25468.htm?selectedLocale=en First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). NATO publics blame Russia for Ukrainian Crisis, but reluctant to provide military aid. Washington, DC: Pre Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J. & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835–845. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.835 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T. & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for Terror Management Theory. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 681–690. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlink, S. & Walther, E. (2007). Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit [Short and sweet: A German short scale for measuring the Need for Cognitive Closure]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(3), 153–161. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.3.153 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schoormans, J. P. L., Carbon, C. C. & Gattol, V. (2011). “It’s time to take a stand”: Depicting crosshairs can indeed promote violence. Perception, 40(3), 371–372. doi: 10.1068/p6942 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar