Erste Evaluation eines Programms zur Frührehabilitation von Langzeitintensivpatient_innen
Abstract
Zusammenfassung.Einleitung: Langzeitintensivpatient_innen sind für Teams von Intensivstationen eine zunehmende Herausforderung aufgrund Symptombelastung und Ressourcenverbrauch. Zur Pflege und Behandlung werden strukturierte multimodale Konzepte empfohlen. Ein lokales, interprofessionelles Programm für Frührehabilitation hat das Ziel, Patient_innen optimal zu betreuen durch einen systematischen, proaktiven und ganzheitlichen Behandlungsprozess mit rehabilitativen Schwerpunkten. Das Programm besteht aus spezifischen Assessments und systematischer Koordination der interprofessionellen Frührehabilitation. Problemstellung und Zielsetzung: Die interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit erfordert von den Beteiligten gegenseitige Akzeptanz und gute Kommunikation. Das Funktionieren ausgewählter Prozesse sowie die Zufriedenheit der Fachpersonen sind Themen einer ersten formativen Evaluation. Methoden: Das Team wertete deskriptive Qualitätsdaten sowie selbsterstellte strukturierte Fragebögen aus. Ergebnisse: Bei 52 von insgesamt 112 Patient_innen im Programm erfolgten spezifische Anpassungen des Behandlungsplanes. Die Assessments sind gut durchführbar und unterstützen die systematische Frührehabilitation. Die interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit und das Verständnis für Patient_innen hat sich aus Sicht der beteiligten Fachpersonen verbessert. Diskussion und Transfer: Das Programm optimiert die Behandlung und fördert gute interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit. Die formative Evaluation gibt wertvolle Hinweise auf zukünftige Prozessveränderungen, wie den Einbezug der Patient_innen sowie weiterer Fachdisziplinen und Entwicklung über die Grenzen der Intensivstation hinaus.
Abstract.Introduction: Chronically critically ill patients are an increasing challenge for teams in intensive care units due to the burden of symptoms and the consumption of resources. Structured multimodal concepts are recommended for nursing care and treatment. A local, interprofessional program for early rehabilitation aims to provide optimal care for patients through a systematic, proactive and holistic treatment process with a rehabilitative focus. The program consists of specific assessments and systematic coordination of interprofessional early rehabilitation. Problem and objective: Interprofessional collaboration requires mutual acceptance and good communication from those involved. The functioning of selected processes as well as the satisfaction of the professionals are topics of a first formative evaluation. Methods: The team evaluated descriptive quality data as well as self-generated structured questionnaires. Results: Specific adjustments were made to the treatment plan for 52 of 112 patients in the program. The assessments are easy to carry out and support systematic early rehabilitation. From the perspective of the professionals involved, both the interprofessional collaboration and their understanding for the patients improved. Discussion and transfer: The program optimizes treatment and promotes good interprofessional collaboration. The formative evaluation provides valuable information for future process changes such as the inclusion of patients as well as further disciplines and program development beyond the boundaries of the intensive care unit.
Literatur
2012). Definitions and epidemiology of the chronically critically ill. Respiratory Care , 57 (6), 848 – 858.
(2011). Caregivers of the chronically critically ill after discharge from the intensive care unit: six months’ experience. American Journal of Critical Care , 20 (1), 12 – 23.
(2020). Barriers and Facilitators to Early Rehabilitation in the ICU: A Theory Driven Delphi Study. Critical Care Medicine , 48 (12), doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004580.
(2015). Speech pathology reliability for stroke swallowing screening items. Dysphagia , 30 (5), 565 – 570.
(2018). Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism and the development of chronic critical illness after surgery. Surgery , 164 (2), 178 – 184.
(2001). Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Critical Care Medicine , 29 (7), 1370 – 1379.
(2009). An integrative review and meta-synthesis of the scope and impact of intensive care liaison and outreach services. Journal of Clinical Nursing , 18 (23), 3225 – 3236.
(2016). Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice , 19 , 36 – 40.
(1985). The chronically critically ill: to save or let die? Respiratory Care , 30 (5), 339 – 347.
(2015). Effect of a dedicated orthopaedic advanced practice provider in a level I trauma center: analysis of length of stay and cost. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma , 29 (7), e225–e230.
(2018). Patient and Population-Level Approaches to Persistent Critical Illness and Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stays. Critical Care Clinics , 34 (4), 493 – 500.
(2015). Symptombelastung und entsprechende Interventionen. Intensiv , 23 (03), 123 – 127.
(2016). CCI–ein Resümee. Intensiv , 24 (01), 14 – 15.
(2014). Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000 – 2012. JAMA , 311 (13), 1308 – 1316.
(2013). Prediction of chronic critical illness in a general intensive care unit. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira , 59 (3), 241 – 247.
(2017). Chronic critical illness: are we saving patients or creating victims? [Doença crítica crônica: estamos salvando ou criando vítimas?]. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva , 29 (1), 87 – 95.
(2013). Practice development in nursing and healthcare . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
(2020). Interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit im Delir-Management gestalten. International Journal of Health Professions , 7 (1), 1 – 12.
(2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society , 53 (4), 695 – 699.
(2010). Chronic critical illness. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , 182 (4), 446 – 454.
(2016). Frühmobilisierung. Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin , 111 (2), 153 – 159.
(2008). Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , 40 (8), 665 – 671.
(2018). Preventing chronic critical illness and rehospitalization: a focus on sepsis. Critical Care Clinics , 34 (4), 501 – 513.
(2019). Patient and family centered actionable processes of care and performance measures for persistent and chronic critical illness: a systematic review. Critical Care Explorations , 1 (4).
(2018). Chronic Critical Illness: Application of What We Know. Nutrition in clinical practice: official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition , 33 (1), 39 – 45.
(2002). Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine , 30 (4), 746 – 752.
(2009). Portfolio zur strategischen Steuerung der Entwicklung einer Intensivstation zum Referenzzentrum. Pflege , 22 (1), 47 – 56.
(2017). Das Ziel: Langzeitintensivpatienten besser versorgen. PflegenIntensiv , 2 / 2017, 1 – 4.
(2019). Development and validation of a multivariable risk score for prolonged length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit. Swiss Medical Weekly , 149 (3738).
(2010). Chronic critical illness: prevalence, profile, and pathophysiology. AACN Advanced Critical Care , 21 (1), 44 – 61.
(2017). The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health , 15 (1), 1 – 22.
(