Skip to main content
Mini-Review

Personalisierte Therapie des chronischen Koronarsyndroms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a003802

Zusammenfassung. Das chronische Koronarsyndrom stellt eine der häufigsten Erkrankungen dar. Die durch das chronische Koronarsyndrom bedingte myokardiale Ischämie kann sowohl durch morphologische wie auch funktionelle Veränderungen der Herzkranzgefässe bedingt sein, wobei Veränderungen das epikardiale Koronarsystem oder die koronare Mikrozirkulation betreffen können. Zur Abklärung von Personen mit Verdacht auf ein chronisches Koronarsyndrom werden nicht-invasive und invasive diagnostische Verfahren eingesetzt. Lebensstilveränderungen, optimale medikamentöse Therapie und die koronare Revaskularisation stellen die Hauptpfeiler in der Behandlung von Patientinnen und Patienten mit chronischem Koronarsyndrom dar. Der vorliegende Übersichtsartikel fasst die unterschiedlichen Formen des chronischen Koronarsyndroms zusammen und diskutiert Diagnostik und Therapie von Menschen mit chronischem Koronarsyndrom. Insbesondere wird der Stellenwert der perkutanen koronaren Revaskularisation in der Behandlung des chronischen Koronarsyndroms erörtert.


Personalized Therapeutic Concepts in Chronic Coronary Syndromes

Abstract. Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) are related to substantial morbidity and mortality. Myocardial ischemia in CCS is caused by either obstructive or non-obstructive alterations of the coronary arteries, including both morphological and functional changes of epicardial vessels and the coronary microvasculature. Diagnostic algorithms of patients with suspected CCS include non-invasive and invasive imaging and functional testing. Therapeutic management comprises lifestyle changes, optimal medical therapy, and coronary revascularization when indicated. This review summarizes the contemporary management of patients with CCS, focusing on the role of invasive assessment and treatment.


Traitement personnalisé du syndrome coronarien chronique

Résumé. Le syndrome coronarien chronique est une des cardiomyopathies les plus fréquentes. L’ischémie myocardique causée par le syndrome coronarien chronique peut résulter en des changements dans la morphologie comme dans la fonction des artères coronaires qui peuvent affecter le système coronaire épicardique ou la microcirculation coronaire. Le dépistage des patients soupçonnés d’avoir un syndrome coronarien chronique s’effectue par des méthodes de diagnostic invasives et non-invasives. Le traitement des patients souffrant de syndrome coronarien chronique se base sur des changements du mode de vie, un traitement médicamenteux optimal et une revascularisation coronarienne. L’article présente une synthèse des différentes formes de syndrome coronarien chronique et discute le diagnostic et la thérapie des patients qui en sont atteints. L’importance élevée de revascularisation coronarienne percutanée dans le traitement du syndrome coronarien chronique fait en particulier l’objet de la discussion.

Bibliografie

  • Townsend N , Nichols M , Scarborough P , et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe – epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J . 2015; 36 (40):2696–2705. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al . 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J . 2020; 41 (3):177–184. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pijls NH , Fearon WF , Tonino PA , et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2010; 56 (3):177–184. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • van Nunen LX , Zimmermann FM , Tonino PA , et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2015; 386 (10006):1853–1860. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Tonino PA , De Bruyne B , Pijls NH , et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med . 2009; 360 (3):213–224. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Davies JE , Sen S , Dehbi HM , et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med . 2017; 376 (19):1824–1834. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gotberg M , Christiansen EH , Gudmundsdottir IJ , et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med . 2017; 376 (19):1813–1823. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Xu B , Tu S , Qiao S , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2017; 70 (25): 3077–3087. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Giannuzzi P , Temporelli PL , Marchioli R , et al. Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: results of the GOSPEL study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network. Arch Intern Med . 2008; 168 (20):2194–204. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Chow CK , Jolly S , Rao-Melacini P , et al. Association of diet, exercise, and smoking modification with risk of early cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes. Circulation . 2010; 121 (6):750–758. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Boden WE , O’Rourke RA , Teo KK , et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med . 2007; 356 (15):1503–1516. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Weintraub WS , Spertus JA , Kolm P , et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med . 2008; 359 (7):677–687. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • De Bruyne B , Fearon WF , Pijls NH , et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med . 2014; 371 (13):1208–1217. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Maron DJ , Hochman JS , Reynolds HR , et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med . 2020; 382 (15):1395–407. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann FJ , Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al.. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J . 2019; 40 (2):87–165. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Farkouh ME , Domanski M , Sleeper LA , et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med . 2012; 367 (25):2375–2384. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Serruys PW , Morice MC , Kappetein AP , et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med . 2009; 360 (10): 961–972. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Mohr FW , Morice MC , Kappetein AP , et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet . 2013; 381 (9867):629–638. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pepine CJ , Anderson RD , Sharaf BL , et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2010; 55 (25):2825–2832. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Schachinger V , Britten MB , Zeiher AM . Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation . 2000; 101 (16): 1899–1906. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Jespersen L , Hvelplund A , Abildstrom SZ , et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J . 2012; 33 (6):734–744. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Sara JD , Widmer RJ , Matsuzawa Y , et al. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv . 2015; 8 (11):1445–1453. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Group JCSJW . Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (Coronary Spastic Angina) (JCS 2013). Circ J . 2014; 78 (11):2779–27801. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Seitz A , Gardezy J , Pirozzolo G , et al. Long-term follow-up in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries undergoing intracoronary acetylcholine testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv . 2020; 13 (16):1865–1876. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kunadian V , Chieffo A , Camici PG , et al. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J . 2020; 41 (37):3504–3520. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Beltrame JF , Crea F , Kaski JC , et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J . 2017; 38 (33):2565–2568. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Aziz A , Hansen HS , Sechtem U , et al. Sex-related differences in vasomotor function in patients with angina and unobstructed coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2017; 70 (19):2349–2358. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wei J , Mehta PK , Johnson BD , et al. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv . 2012; 5 (6):646–653. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ford TJ , Stanley B , Good R , et al. Stratified medical therapy using invasive coronary function testing in angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2018; 72 (23 Pt A):2841–2855. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar